ESTABLISHMENTS WITH A RISK OF MAJOR ACCIDENT (PROVINCIAL AND REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION)

    Panel 1
    Update date
    Authors

    Fabrizio Vazzana, Francesca Pepe

    Abstract
    Graph
    Abstract

    The indicator identifies the number of establishments, by regional and provincial level, divided by category, based on the regulatory requirements to which establishment operators are subject. As of June 30, 2025, the total number of establishments considered hazardous for the purposes of a major accident in Italy was 932. Compared to December 2024, when the number of establishments was 933, there has been a reduction (one less). Regarding the distribution of notified establishments across the country, the situation remains virtually unchanged, with approximately a quarter concentrated in Lombardy and in regions with a high industrial presence, such as Veneto, Piedmont, and Emilia-Romagna. Almost all Italian provinces contain at least one establishment at risk of a major accident.

    Description

    The data available for this indicator are the number of establishments, by regional and provincial scope, divided by category, based on the obligations established by the legislation to which the managers of the establishments are subject. Legislative Decree 26 June 2015, n. 105, in line with the European Directive 2012/18/EU on the control of major-accident hazards connected with the possession of dangerous substances, identifies, based on the nature and quantity of dangerous substances, two different categories of industries with major-accident hazards, associating certain obligations to each of them. In particular, Article 3, paragraph 1 of Legislative Decree 105/15 identifies the following categories of establishments: - “Lower-tier establishment”: an establishment in which the hazardous substances are present in quantities equal to or greater than the quantities listed in column 2 of Part 1 or in column 2 of Part 2 of Annex 1, but in quantities lower than the quantities listed in column 3 of Part 1, or in column 3 of Part 2 of Annex 1, applying, where applicable, the summation rule referred to in note 4 of Annex 1; - “Upper-tier establishment”: an establishment in which hazardous substances are present in quantities equal to or greater than the quantities listed in column 3 of Part 1 or in column 3 of Part 2 of Annex 1, applying, where applicable, the summation rule referred to in note 4 of Annex 1. Managers of establishments that meet these characteristics must comply with specific obligations, including preparing technical and informative documentation, which differs according to the category, in terms of content and recipients. Specifically, it is mandatory to submit to the competent authorities, including ISPRA, the information in the form in Annex 5 of Legislative Decree 105/2015, prepare a “Relevant Accident Prevention Policy Document” and adopt a Safety Management System commensurate with the dangers and complexity of the company and the processes used. The so-called SGS-PIR is mandatory by law, the only case among all the other management systems. For upper-tier establishments, the manager is required to draw up a “Safety Report” to be sent to the competent authority responsible for its assessment (Regional Technical Committees of the Fire Brigade).

    Purpose

    To provide an overview of the pressures exerted by establishments at risk of major accidents on the territory.

     
    Policy relevance and utility for users
    It is of national scope or applicable to environmental issues at the regional level but of national significance.
    It is able to describe the trend without necessarily providing an evaluation of it.
    It is simple and easy to interpret.
    It is sensitive to changes occurring in the environment and/or human activities
    It provides a representative overview of environmental conditions, environmental pressures, and societal responses.
    It provides a basis for international comparisons
    Analytical soundness
    Be based on international standards and international consensus about its validity;
    Be theoretically well founded in technical and scientific terms
    Presents reliability and validity of measurement and data collection methods
    Temporal comparability
    Spatial comparability
    Measurability (data)
    Adequately documented and of known quality
    Updated at regular intervals in accordance with reliable procedures
    Readily available or made available at a reasonable cost/benefit ratio
    An “adequate” spatial coverage
    An “appropriate” temporal coverage
    Main regulatory references and objectives

    Preparation of the national inventory of establishments likely to cause major accidents (art. 5, paragraph 3 of Legislative Decree 105/2015).

    DPSIR
    Pressure
    Indicator type
    Descriptive (A)
    References

    ISPRA-MASE, Inventario Seveso ISPRA, Annuario dei dati ambientali - Vari anni

    Limitations

    None

    Further actions

    None

    Data source
    ISPRA (Higher Institute for Environmental Protection and Research)
    MASE (Ministry of Environment and Energy Security)
    Data collection frequency
    Continuos
    Data availabilty

    All information comes from the National Inventory of establishments likely to cause major accidents, provided for by Article 5, paragraph 3 of Legislative Decree 105/15. 
    https://www.rischioindustriale.isprambiente.gov.it/seveso-query-105/Default.php

    Spatial coverage

    National, Regional, Provincial

    Time coverage

    2023-2025

    Processing methodology

    All information is taken from the National Inventory of establishments likely to cause major accidents, provided for by Article 5, paragraph 3 of Legislative Decree 105/2015. The inventory allows the extraction of an Excel file that allows to extrapolate after different steps, the data necessary for updating the indicator.

    Update frequency
    Year
    Data quality

    This is information provided by managers to the competent Authorities (including MASE, through ISPRA) pursuant to specific obligations set forth in Legislative Decree 105/2015, which provides for administrative and criminal sanctions in the event of failure to declare. The data is then collected, validated and processed by ISPRA, also through comparison with the information held by the regions and territorially competent regional agencies. The information is easily available and updated at regular intervals, with adequate spatial and temporal coverage.

    Status
    Undefinable
    Trend
    Steady
    State assessment/description

    As of June 30, 2025, the total number of establishments considered hazardous for the purposes of a major accident, present in Italy, is equal to 932. Compared to December 2024, where the number of establishments was equal to 933, a reduction (1 less) has been recorded.

    Trend assessment/description

    No significant changes are highlighted, even considering the slight decrease, in the number and type of industries subject to the obligations imposed by the “Seveso” legislation.

    Comments

    Table 1, with reference to information updated as of June 30, 2025, summarizes the distribution across the country of establishments subject to Legislative Decree 105/2015, belonging to the various categories (upper and lower threshold) and therefore to the obligations set forth in Articles 13 and 15, divided by province and region. Regarding the distribution across the country of notified establishments, approximately a quarter are concentrated in Lombardy. Regions with a high presence of at-risk industries also include Veneto, Emilia-Romagna, and Piedmont (all in the North and with 8-9% each). Particular concentrations of industries can be noted in areas mostly coinciding with petrochemical (formerly Enichem) and refining hubs such as Trecate (in the Novara area), Porto Marghera, Ferrara and Ravenna in the North, Gela (CL), Augusta-Priolo-Melilli-(Syracuse), and Sarroch (CA). Significant concentrations of industries are also found in industrial areas in the provinces of Milan, Bergamo, Brescia, Naples, Venice, Pavia, Alessandria, and Vicenza. Recently, due to the global economic and industrial crisis, and the petrochemical industry in particular, some of these areas have been partially abandoned or are undergoing industrial transformation (where petroleum chemistry is being replaced by green chemistry). In almost all Italian provinces there is at least one establishment at risk of a major accident, and those with a high number of establishments are: - in the North: Milan (59 establishments), Bergamo (38), Brescia (37), Ravenna (35), Venice (21), Pavia (20), Vicenza (20), Alessandria (20), Turin (19), Novara (19), Udine (19), Lodi (18), Monza and Brianza (17), Varese (17), Bologna (16), Genoa (16), Verona (15), Cremona (13), Padua (12), Ferrara (11), Mantua (10). In the Centre: Rome (18), Frosinone (15), Livorno (13), Latina (10), Florence (10). In the South and Islands: Naples (34), Salerno (17), Syracuse (14), Cagliari (12), Catania (11), Caserta (10).

    Data
    File
    Headline

    Tabella 1-Numero di stabilimenti di soglia superiore e inferiore per provincia

    Data source

    Inventario ISPRA

    Immagine
    Headline

    Distribuzione regionale e provinciale stabilimenti RIR (2024)

    Data source

    Inventario ISPRA

    Immagine
    Headline

    Distribuzione regionale e provinciale stabilimenti RIR - soglia superiore (2024)

    Data source

    Inventario ISPRA

    Immagine
    Headline

    Distribuzione regionale e provinciale stabilimenti RIR - soglia inferiore (2024)

    Data source

    Inventario ISPRA

    Graph
    English