ESTABLISHMENTS WITH A RISK OF MAJOR ACCIDENT (PROVINCIAL AND REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION)

    Panel 1
    Update date
    Authors

    Fabrizio Vazzana, Francesca Pepe

    Abstract
    Graph
    Abstract

    The indicator allows the number of establishments to be identified, by regional and provincial area, divided by category, based on the obligations established by the legislation to which the plant managers are subject. Al november 30, 2025, the total number of establishments considered dangerous for the purposes of a major accident, present in Italy, is equal to 971. As compared to june 2025, where the number of establishments was equal to 932, there is an increase (39 more). Regarding the distribution of the notified establishments throughout the country, the situation remains almost unchanged, around a quarter is concentrated in Lombardy and in regions with a high presence of industries such as: Veneto, Piedmont and Emilia-Romagna . In almost all Italian provinces there is at least one plant at risk of a major accident.

    Description

    The data available for this indicator is the number of establishments, by regional and provincial area, divided by category, based on the obligations established by the legislation to which the establishment managers are subject. Legislative Decree 26 June 2015, n. 105, consistently with the European Directive 2012/18/EU relating to the control of the risk of major accidents associated with the possession of dangerous substances, identifies, based on the nature and quantity of the dangerous substances, two different categories of industries with the risk of major accidents, associating certain obligations with each of them. In particular, article 3, paragraph 1 of Legislative Decree 105/15 identifies the following categories of establishments: - "Lower threshold establishment": an establishment in which dangerous substances are present in quantities equal to or greater than the quantities listed in column 2 of part 1 or in column 2 of part 2 of annex 1, but in quantities lower than the quantities listed in column 3 of part 1, or in column 3 of part 2 of annex 1, applying, where applicable, the summation rule referred to in note 4 of Annex 1; - "Upper threshold establishment": an establishment in which dangerous substances are present in quantities equal to or greater than the quantities listed in column 3 of part 1 or in column 3 of part 2 of annex 1, applying, where applicable, the summation rule referred to in note 4 of annex 1. The managers of establishments that meet these characteristics must fulfill specific obligations including preparing technical and information documentation, which differs depending on the category, content and recipients. Specifically, it is mandatory to submit to the competent authorities, including ISPRA, the information referred to in the form of annex 5 of Legislative Decree 105/2015, prepare a "Document of policy for the prevention of major accidents and the adoption of a Safety Management System commensurate with the dangers and complexity of the company and the processes used. The so-called SGS-PIR is mandatory by law, the only case among all the other management systems. For threshold establishments superior, the manager is required to draw up a "Safety Report" to be sent to the competent authority responsible for its evaluation (Regional Technical Committees of the Fire Brigade).

    Purpose

    Provide a general picture of the pressures exerted by establishments at risk of a major accident in the area.

    Policy relevance and utility for users
    It is of national scope or applicable to environmental issues at the regional level but of national significance.
    It is able to describe the trend without necessarily providing an evaluation of it.
    It is simple and easy to interpret.
    It is sensitive to changes occurring in the environment and/or human activities
    It provides a representative overview of environmental conditions, environmental pressures, and societal responses.
    It provides a basis for international comparisons
    Analytical soundness
    Be based on international standards and international consensus about its validity;
    Be theoretically well founded in technical and scientific terms
    Presents reliability and validity of measurement and data collection methods
    Temporal comparability
    Spatial comparability
    Measurability (data)
    Adequately documented and of known quality
    Updated at regular intervals in accordance with reliable procedures
    Readily available or made available at a reasonable cost/benefit ratio
    An “adequate” spatial coverage
    An “appropriate” temporal coverage
    Main regulatory references and objectives

    Preparation of the national inventory of establishments likely to cause major accidents (art. 5, paragraph 3 of Legislative Decree 105/2015).

    DPSIR
    Pressure
    Indicator type
    Descriptive (A)
    References

    ISPRA-MASE, Seveso Inventory ISPRA, Yearbook of environmental data - Various years

    Limitations

    None

    Further actions

    none

    Data source

    ISPRA MASE (Ministry of the Environment and Energy Safety)

    Data collection frequency
    Continuos
    Data availabilty

    All information comes from the national inventory of establishments likely to cause major accidents, provided for by article 5, paragraph 3 of Legislative Decree 105/15. Https://www. rischioindustriale. isprambiente. gov. it/seveso-query-105/Default. php

    Spatial coverage

    National, Regional, Provincial

    Time coverage

    2023-2025

    Processing methodology

    All information is taken from the National Inventory of establishments likely to cause major accidents, provided for by Article 5, paragraph 3 of Legislative Decree 105/2015. The inventory allows the extraction of an Excel file which allows the data necessary to update the indicator to be extrapolated after different steps.

    Update frequency
    Year
    Data quality

    This is information provided by managers to the competent authorities (including MASE, through ISPRA) pursuant to specific obligations established by Legislative Decree 105/2015, which provides for administrative and criminal sanctions in the event of failure to declare. The data is then collected, validated and processed by ISPRA, also through comparison with the information held by the regions and territorially competent regional agencies. The information is easily available and updated at regular intervals, with adequate spatial and temporal coverage.

    Status
    Undefinable
    Trend
    Steady
    State assessment/description

    Al november 30, 2025, the total number of establishments considered dangerous for the purposes of a major accident, present in Italy, is equal to 971. As compared to june 2025, where the number of establishments was equal to 932, there is an increase (39 more).

    Trend assessment/description

    No significant changes are highlighted considering the trend over the years, although with an increase in the number and type of industries subject to the obligations imposed by the "Seveso" legislation.

    Comments

    In Table 1, with reference to the updated information a november 30, 2025, the distribution on the national territory of the establishments subject to Legislative Decree 105/2015, belonging to the different categories (upper threshold and lower threshold) and therefore to the obligations referred to in the articles, is summarized. 13 and 15, divided by provinces and regions. Regarding the distribution of the notified establishments throughout the country, approximately a quarter is concentrated in Lombardy. Regions with a high presence of industries at risk are also: Veneto, Emilia-Romagna and Piedmont (all in the North and with 8-9% each). Particular concentrations of industries can be noted in areas coinciding mostly with the petrochemical (formerly Enichem) and refining hubs such as Trecate (in the Novara area), Porto Marghera, Ferrara and Ravenna in the North, Gela (CL), Augusta-Priolo-Melilli-(Syracuse) and Sarroch (CA). Important concentrations of industries are also found in industrial areas in the provinces of Milan, Bergamo, Brescia, Naples, Venice, Pavia, Alessandria, Vicenza. In recent times, thanks to the global economic-industrial crisis and that of the petrochemical industry in particular, some of the aforementioned areas have been partially abandoned or are undergoing industrial transformation (where petroleum chemistry is being replaced with green chemistry). In almost all Italian provinces there is at least one factory at risk of a major accident, and those with a high number of factories are: - in the North: Milan (60 factories), Bergamo (39), Ravenna (38), Brescia (37), Venice (22), Turin (22), Pavia (21), Alexandria (21), Vicenza (20), Novara (20), Udine (20),  Lodi (20), Monza and Brianza (17), Varese (17), Bologna (16), Genoa (16), Verona (16), Cremona (13), Padua (12), Ferrara (12), Mantua (10). At the Center: Rome (19), Frosinone (16), Livorno (13), Latin (10), Florence (10). In the South and Islands: Naples (35), Salerno (18), Syracuse (15), Caserta (13), Cagliari (12), Catania (12).

    Data
    Headline

    Table 1: Number of upper and lower threshold establishments distributed by province (updated 11/30/2025)

    Data source

    ISPRA

    Thumbnail
    Headline

    Figure 1: Regional distribution of establishments with major accident hazard

    Data source

    ISPRA

    Thumbnail
    Headline

    Figure 2: Provincial distribution of establishments with risk of major accidents

    Data source

    ISPRA

    Graph
    English