ENVIRONMENTALLY BENEFICIAL SUBSIDIES AND ENVIRONMENTALLY HARMFUL SUBSIDIES

Data aggiornamento scheda
Autori

Cristina Frizza

Abstract

In 2022, the sixth edition of the Catalogue of Environmentally Relevant Subsidies identified a total of 183 measures, resulting in €24.2 billion in Environmentally Harmful Subsidies (EHS) and €20.2 billion in Environmentally Beneficial Subsidies (EBS), representing a year-on-year increase of 15.1% and a decrease of 2.5%, respectively. Subsidies amounting to €13.8 billion were classified as having uncertain environmental impact, marking a 7.5% increase compared to 2021. Among the Environmentally Harmful Subsidies, those related to fossil fuels accounted for €17 billion in 2022 (compared to €13 billion in 2020 and €14.8 billion in 2021).

Descrizione

The indicator identifies subsidies with environmentally beneficial, harmful, or uncertain effects. Subsidies include incentives, concessions, soft loans, and tax exemptions explicitly aimed at environmental protection. Subsidies are classified into two main categories: direct subsidies (such as direct transfers of funds and grants) and indirect subsidies (including tax expenditures, incentives, and exemptions). Indirect subsidies also include implicit subsidies, which may arise from the general tax system and create incentives that influence production or consumption behaviours in ways that can be either environmentally beneficial or environmentally harmful. The indicator provides information on both direct and indirect incentives related to energy resources, with the objective of supporting environmental fiscal reform aimed at decarbonising the economy and promoting environmentally beneficial activities.

Scopo

Summarising subsidies with environmentally beneficial and harmful effects aims to provide policymakers with the necessary information to support the phase-out of environmentally harmful subsidies (EHS) and the adoption, strengthening, and improvement of environmentally beneficial subsidies (EBS).

Rilevanza
È di portata nazionale oppure applicabile a temi ambientali a livello regionale ma di significato nazionale
È in grado di descrivere la tendenza senza necessariamente fornire una valutazione della stessa.
È semplice, facile da interpretare.
Fornisce una base per confronti internazionali.
Solidità
È basato su standard nazionali/internazionali e sul consenso nazionale/internazionale circa la sua validità
È ben fondato sul piano tecnico e scientifico.
Presenta affidabilità e attendibilità dei metodi di misurazione e raccolta dei dati
Comparabilità nel tempo
Comparabilità nello spazio
Misurabilità (dati)
Adeguatamente documentati e di fonte nota
Aggiornati a intervalli regolari e con procedure affidabili
Facilmente disponibili o resi disponibili a fronte di un ragionevole rapporto costi/benefici
Un’ “adeguata” copertura spaziale
Un’ “idonea” copertura temporale
Principali riferimenti normativi e obiettivi

Article 68 of Law No. 221 of 28 December 2015 established, within the Ministry of the Environment and the Protection of Land and Sea, the Catalogue of Environmentally Harmful Subsidies (EHS) and Environmentally Beneficial Subsidies (EBS). The Catalogue is managed using the existing human, financial, and instrumental resources available under current legislation, without generating new or additional burdens on public finances.
The same article mandates that the Catalogue be updated annually by 30 June.

The main objectives of the Catalogue are as follows:
a) to identify policy measures aimed at fiscal reform in line with the "polluter pays principle";
b) to reduce the tax burden on labour and businesses, while offsetting revenue losses through environmental taxation targeting environmentally harmful consumption and production;
c) to reduce overall tax expenditures.

DPSIR
Risposta
Tipologia indicatore
Efficacia delle politiche (D)
Riferimenti bibliografici

MASE, Catalogo dei sussidi ambientalmente dannosi e dei sussidi ambientalmente favorevoli ed. 2024

Fonte dei dati

MASE- Ministry of the Environment and Energy Security

Frequenza di rilevazione dei dati
Annuale
Accessibilità dei dati di base

MASE - Catalogue of Environmentally Harmful Subsidies (EHS) and Environmentally Beneficial Subsidies (EBS) - https://www.mase.gov.it/portale/catalogo-dei-sussidi-ambientalmente-dannosi-e-dei-sussidi-ambientalmente-favorevoli

Copertura spaziale

National

Copertura temporale

2017-2022

Core SET
EEA - Set of Indicators
Descrizione della metodologia di elaborazione

The definition of subsidy adopted in the Catalogue aligns with that used by the OECD, and includes—among other instruments—“incentives, concessions, soft loans, and tax exemptions explicitly aimed at environmental protection.” This definition encompasses both tax expenditures and direct subsidies.

In identifying the various subsidies, multiple methodologies are considered (e.g. quick scan, checklists, etc.), with the aim of providing policymakers with the necessary information to support the phase-out of Environmentally Harmful Subsidies (EHS) and the adoption, strengthening, and increased efficiency of Environmentally Beneficial Subsidies (EBS).

Similarly, different approaches are taken into account for the quantification of subsidies, such as the price gap method, marginal social cost estimates, and assessments of external costs.

Periodicità di aggiornamento
Annuale
Data quality

The information is produced by the Ministry of the Environment and Energy Security (MASE) and is relevant for supporting the decarbonisation of the economy and the resulting reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.

The indicator provides a concise overview of the country's economic commitment to promoting renewable energy sources and discouraging the use of fossil fuels.

Stato
Scarso
Trend
Stabile
Valutazione/descrizione dello stato

In 2022, the value of Environmentally Harmful Subsidies (EHS) amounted to €24.2 billion, while Environmentally Beneficial Subsidies (EBS) totalled €20.3 billion. Subsidies with an uncertain environmental impact reached €13.8 billion. Given the high share of subsidies classified as environmentally harmful (41.5% of the total), the overall balance can be considered environmentally negative.

Valutazione/descrizione del trend

In 2022, all categories of environmentally relevant subsidies showed an increase compared to 2017. Environmentally Harmful Subsidies (EHS) rose by 20.9%, exceeding the growth rate of Environmentally Beneficial Subsidies (EBS), which increased by 17.7%.

Subsidies with an uncertain environmental impact grew by more than 64%, outlining a slightly deteriorating trend in the overall environmental quality of public support measures.

Commenti

In 2022, Environmentally Harmful Subsidies (EHS) increased by 15.1% compared to the previous year, while Environmentally Beneficial Subsidies (EBS) grew by 2.5% (see Figure 1 and Table 1). Subsidies with uncertain environmental impact rose by 7.5%.

Subsidies are distributed across the categories ‘Agriculture and Fisheries’, ‘Energy’, ‘Transport’, ‘Other Subsidies’, and ‘Reduced VAT’, based on international classifications and the relative environmental impact of each sector. In 2022, the ‘Energy’ and ‘Reduced VAT’ categories accounted for over 64% of Environmentally Harmful Subsidies; the ‘Energy’ and ‘Agriculture and Fisheries’ categories represented more than 57% of Environmentally Beneficial Subsidies; and the ‘Reduced VAT’ and ‘Agriculture and Fisheries’ categories covered over 73% of subsidies with uncertain attribution (see Table 1).

Category-specific analysis also shows a year-on-year increase in Environmentally Harmful Subsidies in ‘Other Subsidies’ (+59.3%) and ‘Reduced VAT’ (+25%), while decreases were observed in ‘Energy’ (-13.4%), ‘Agriculture and Fisheries’ (-2.4%), and ‘Transport’ (-3.7%) (see Table 1).

Data
Allegati
Titolo

Table 1: Estimated total annual subsidies by sector and type (million euros)

Fonte

MASE: Ministry of the Environment and Energy Security

Legenda

SAD: Environmentally Harmful Subsidy; SAF: Environmentally Beneficial Subsidy; SAI: Environmentally uncertain subsidies

Thumbnail
Titolo

Figure 1: Total annual subsidies by environmental impact category

Fonte

ISPRA elaborations based on MASE data