COASTAL MARINE WATERS – BIOLOGICAL QUALITY ELEMENT ANGIOSPERMS POSIDONIA OCEANICA PREI INDEX

    Descrizione 1
    Update date
    Authors

    Marina Penna

    Abstract
    Immagine
    Abstract

    In the assessment of the ecological quality of coastal marine environments within the framework of the European Directive 2000/60/EC (transposed by Legislative Decree 152/2006 and subsequent amendments), reference is made to the Biological Quality Element (BQE) Angiosperms. This BQE in Italy, as provided for by the Ministry of the Environment Decree 260/2010, is evaluated through the PREI (Posidonia Rapid Easy Index). In this context, in fact, the meadows of Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile take on considerable importance in assessing the ecological quality of coastal marine environments, given their wide distribution and sensitivity to sources of disturbance of anthropogenic origin. The classification of this BQE is carried out where, for reasons of geographical distribution, the meadow is present, i.e., in the Tyrrhenian regions and in Apulia. The data analyzed show that more than 80% of the meadows are in "good" or "high" status.

    Description

    The PREI (Posidonia Rapid Easy Index) is a multimetric index based on univariate statistics. It is based on the analysis of five different descriptors of the Posidonia oceanica meadow under study. From the degree of deviation from reference conditions (Environmental Quality Ratio, EQR), the PREI index provides information on the "ecological status" of the water body and its classification into one of the five classes: "high status," "good status," "moderate status," "poor status," "bad status" (as per Directive 2000/60/EC).
    The classification of this BQE is carried out where, for reasons of geographical distribution, the meadow is present, i.e., in the Tyrrhenian regions and in Apulia.

    Purpose

    To formulate an ecological quality assessment for coastal marine environments within the framework of the current legislation (Legislative Decree 152/2006 and subsequent amendments), through the use of the Biological Quality Element (BQE) Angiosperms, integrating over time the effects of different causes of physical, chemical, and biological alterations, induced by pollutants in the water and sediments, or by significant physico-morphological alterations of the coastal stretch.

    Policy relevance and utility for users
    It is of national scope or it is applicable to environmental issues at the regional level but of national relevance.
    It is simple and easy to interpret.
    It provides a representative picture of environmental conditions, environmental pressures, and societal responses
    Ha una soglia o un valore di riferimento con cui può essere confrontato
    Analytical soundness
    Be based on international standards and international consensus about its validity;
    Be theoretically well founded in technical and scientific terms
    Presents reliability and validity of measurement and data collection methods
    Temporal comparability
    Spatial comparability
    Measurability (data)
    Adequately documented and of known quality
    Updated at regular intervals in accordance with reliable procedures
    Readily available or made available at a reasonable cost/benefit ratio
    An “adequate” spatial coverage
    Main regulatory references and objectives

    Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC); Legislative Decree 152/06 “Consolidated Act on Water”; Ministerial Decree 56/09 “Regulation containing «Technical criteria for the monitoring of water bodies and the identification of reference conditions for the amendment of the technical standards of Legislative Decree April 3, 2006, no. 152, containing Environmental regulations, prepared pursuant to Article 75, paragraph 3, of the same Legislative Decree»”; Ministerial Decree 260/10 “Regulation containing the technical criteria for the classification of the status of surface water bodies, for the amendment of the technical standards of Legislative Decree April 3, 2006, no. 152, containing environmental regulations, prepared pursuant to Article 75, paragraph 3, of the same Legislative Decree”.
    Class limits defining the thresholds of the Ecological Quality Ratio (EQR):
    1 – 0.775 High
    0.774 – 0.550 Good
    0.549 – 0.325 Moderate
    0.324 – 0.100 Poor
    < 0.100 – 0 Bad

    DPSIR
    State
    Indicator type
    Descriptive (A)
    Performance (B)
    References

    Gobert, S., Sartoretto, S., Rico-Raimondino, V., Andral, B., Chery, A., Lejeune, P., Boissery, P., 2009. Assessment of the ecological status of Mediterranean French coastal waters as required by the Water Framework Directive using the Posidonia oceanica Rapid Easy Index (PREI). Marine Pollution Bulletin 58, 1727–1733;
    Bacci T., Rende S. F., Penna M., Trabucco B., Montefalcone M, Cicero A. M., Giovanardi F., 2013. A methodological approach to understand functional relationships between ecological indices and human-induced pressures: the case of the Posidonia oceanica meadows. Journal of Environmental Management 129, 540-547.

    Frequenza di rilevazione dei dati
    Triennale
    Fonte dei dati
    ARPA costiere
    Data availabilty

    Dati EIONET/SOE e Piani di Distretto 
    www.sintai.isprambiente.it/faces/public/WFD/index.xhtml

    Spatial coverage

    Coastal regions

    Time coverage

    2019-2022

    Processing methodology

    The PREI Index includes the calculation of five descriptors: meadow density (shoots m⁻²); leaf area per shoot (cm² shoot⁻¹); ratio between epiphyte biomass (mg shoot⁻¹) and leaf biomass per shoot (mg shoot⁻¹); depth of the lower limit and type of the lower limit.
    Meadow density, leaf area per shoot, and the ratio between epiphyte biomass and leaf biomass are assessed at the standard depth of 15 m; in cases where the bathymetric development of the meadow does not allow sampling at the standard depth, an appropriate depth specific to the case may be chosen, with a justification.

    The method for calculating the PREI index involves applying the following equation:
    EQR = (EQR’ + 0.11)/(1 + 0.10)
    where EQR’ = (Ndensity + Nleaf area per shoot + Nepiphyte biomass/leaf biomass + Nlower limit)/3.5

    where:

    • Ndensity = (measured value – 0) / (reference value – 0), where “0” is the value indicating poor conditions.
    • Nleaf area per shoot = (measured value – 0) / (reference value – 0), where “0” indicates poor conditions.
    • Nepiphyte biomass/leaf biomass = [1 – (epiphyte biomass/leaf biomass)] * 0.5.
    • Nlower limit = (N' – 12) / (reference depth value – 12), where 12 m is considered the minimum lower limit depth indicating poor conditions.
    • N' = measured depth of the lower limit + lambda, where
      • lambda = 0 (stable lower limit),
      • lambda = 3 (progressive lower limit),
      • lambda = -3 (regressive lower limit).

    For classification purposes, the conclusions shared at the EU level, which all classification indices (including PREI) adhere to, are reported below:

    1. Identification of "bad" status
      “Bad” status is identified under environmental conditions incompatible with the survival of Posidonia oceanica; in particular, it corresponds to a recent (< 5 years) disappearance of the meadow.
    2. Definition of EQR intervals
      The “poor-bad” interval value has been arbitrarily set at 0.1; not wishing to create unequal classes, the remaining EQR scale was thus divided into four equal parts.
    Update frequency
    Three-year
    Qualità dell'informazione

    The information reported is on a national scale where, for biogeographical reasons, the classified habitat (the P. oceanica meadow) can be found. The proposed indicator has been tested based on its sensitivity to the main pressures affecting the coastal zone and is aligned with the regulatory requirements expressed by the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC), allowing classification into 5 ecological quality classes. Furthermore, it has been intercalibrated at the European level, thus ensuring high data comparability and is based on a solid scientific background.

    State
    Good
    Trend
    Undefinable
    State assessment/description

    More than 80% of the analyzed stations fall within the “good” and “high” status; however, 18% of stations are in “moderate” status, therefore below the regulatory target (achievement of “good” status).

    Trend assessment/description

    The trend is not yet definable due to the lack of robust time series data.

    Comments

    The data for the period 2019–2022 show good national coverage. However, there is some heterogeneity regarding the number of classified stations per region analyzed, ranging from a minimum of 3 in Lazio to a maximum of 30 in Sicily (Figure 1). The region with the highest percentage of stations in “moderate” status is Apulia (60%), while only in Sardinia, Sicily, and Tuscany are there stations in “high” class (Figure 1).
    However, the data relating to the Apulian meadows is open to interpretation because the peculiar biogeographical situation of this region gives the meadow a singular morpho-functional structure, which only partially allows for a meaningful comparison with the reference conditions imposed by current legislation.
    In summary, at the national level, for the period 2019–2022, more than 80% of stations reached the quality standard (at least “good”) (Figure 2).

    Data
    Thumbnail
    Headline

    Figure 1: Ecological classification of stations by region according to the EQB Angiosperms (PREI) (2019-2022)

    Data source

    Sintai Eionet SoE

    Thumbnail
    Headline

    Figure 2: National Ecological Classification of Stations Based on EQB Angiosperms (PREI) (2019-2022)

    Data source

    Sintai Eionet SoE

    English