CULTURAL HERITAGE EXPOSED TO SEISMIC HAZARD

Update date
Authors

Gabriele Leoni, Daniele Spizzichino, Valerio Comerci

Abstract

As of December 31, 2024, 16,729 cultural heritage sites are located in municipalities classified as areas with a high probability of strong earthquakes, representing 7.3% of the total cultural heritage.

Description

This indicator provides the number of cultural heritage sites exposed to seismic hazard across the national territory. The estimate was made using the following input data: architectural, monumental, and archaeological sites from the VIR (Vincoli in Rete) database managed by the ISCR (Istituto Superiore per la Conservazione ed il Restauro); the new seismic classification adopted by regions and autonomous provinces following the OPCM 20 March 2003, No. 3274 and OPCM 28 April 2006, No. 3519.

Purpose

To provide an initial overview, at national, regional, and municipal levels, of the distribution of cultural heritage exposed to seismic hazard.

Policy relevance and utility for users
It is of national scope or applicable to environmental issues at the regional level but of national significance.
It is simple and easy to interpret.
It provides a representative overview of environmental conditions, environmental pressures, and societal responses.
It provides a basis for international comparisons
Analytical soundness
Be theoretically well founded in technical and scientific terms
Presents reliability and validity of measurement and data collection methods
Temporal comparability
Spatial comparability
Measurability (data)
Adequately documented and of known quality
Updated at regular intervals in accordance with reliable procedures
An “adequate” spatial coverage
An “appropriate” temporal coverage
Main regulatory references and objectives

Implementation by the Regions and Autonomous Provinces of OPCM 20 March 2003, No. 3274 and OPCM 28 April 2006, No. 3519.

Acts of implementation were completed by 31 January 2020.

Abruzzo: DGR 29/3/03, n. 438. Basilicata: DCR 19/11/03, n. 731. Calabria: DGR 10/2/04, n. 47. Campania: DGR 7/11/02, n. 5447. Emilia-Romagna: DGR 23/07/18, n. 1164. Friuli-Venezia Giulia: DGR 6/5/10, n. 845. Lazio: DGR 22/5/09, n. 387. Liguria: DGR 17/03/17, n. 216. Lombardia: DGR 11/7/14, n. X/2129 Marche: DGR 29/7/03, n. 1046. Molise: DGR 20/9/06, n. 194. Piemonte: DGR 15 febbraio 2019, n. 17-8404. Puglia: DGR 2/3/04, n. 153. Sardegna: DGR 30/3/04, n. 15/31. Sicilia: DDG 11/03/22, n. 64. Toscana: DGR 26/5/14, n. 421. Trentino-Alto Adige-Bolzano, DGP 6/11/06, n. 4047; Trento, DGP 27/12/12, n. 2919/S049/2020-21.3. Umbria: DGR 18/9/12, n. 1111. Veneto: DGR n. 244 del 09 marzo 2021. Valle d'Aosta: DGR 4/10/13 n. 1603.

DPSIR
State
Impact
Indicator type
Descriptive (A)
References

-

Limitations

The indicator is subject to approximations due to the scale of analysis, which is conducted at the municipal level.

Further actions

Future actions aimed at improving this indicator will be carried out by incorporating, where present, seismic microzonation studies on a municipal basis and, where possible, associating expected seismic acceleration values directly with the individual asset. Implementation of the ISCR VIR database.

Data source

ISCR
ISPRA
Civil Defense

Data collection frequency
Yearly
Data availabilty

Basic data on Italy's cultural heritage can be found and accessed at: http://vincoliinrete.beniculturali.it/VincoliInRete/vir/utente/login

Spatial coverage

National, based on municipalities

Time coverage

2024

Processing methodology

Geostatistical alignment and analysis on a GIS platform of data from various databases.

Update frequency
Year
Data quality

The information is of national scope, simple, easy to interpret, and provides a solid foundation for international comparisons.

Status
Undefinable
Trend
Undefinable
State assessment/description

As of December 31, 2024, 16,729 cultural heritage sites are located in municipalities classified as high seismic risk areas, making up 7.3% of the total cultural heritage. A total of 109,346 cultural heritage sites are located in municipalities in seismic class 1 or 2.

Trend assessment/description

Qualitative changes in the indicator can only occur following updates to seismic classification and/or the information on exposed cultural heritage sites. The slight variation in the total number of exposed sites compared to the previous survey arises from corrections to the database, both qualitative (geolocation) and quantitative (integration of site numbers). The seismic classification at the municipal level was updated in September 2024. The trend is not definable.

Comments

As of December 31, 2024, 16,729 cultural heritage sites (Table 1) are located in municipalities classified as areas with a high probability of strong earthquakes (zones 1 and 1-2A), representing 7.3% of the total cultural heritage.
Regions with the highest number of cultural heritage sites in seismic class 1 or 2 municipalities (where strong earthquakes are possible) are:

Marche: 22,885 sites (9.9%)

Lazio: 12,139 sites (5.3%)

Veneto: 11,800 sites (5.1%)

Campania: 11,331 sites (4.9%)

Sicily: 7,906 sites (3.4%)

In total, 109,346 cultural heritage sites are located in municipalities classified as seismic class 1 or 2 (Table 2).
Municipalities in seismic class 1 with the most cultural heritage sites (over 300) are:

L'Aquila (714)

Messina (422)

Spoleto (419)

Foligno (353)

Reggio Calabria (328)

Benevento (320) (Table 3).

Data
Data
Headline

Tabella 1: Numero dei beni culturali per comuni classificati secondo la diversa pericolosità sismica (2024)

Data source

Elaborazione ISPRA su dati ISPRA, ISCR, Protezione Civile

Data legend

Zona sismica con probabilità di superamento pari al 10% in 50 anni (ag): 1 = ag > 0,25; 2 = 0,15<ag≤0,25; 3 = 0,05<ag≤0,15; 4 = ag≤0,05

Headline

Tabella 2: Beni culturali, in classe sismica 1 o 2, per regione (2024)

Data source

Elaborazione ISPRA su dati SPRA, ISCR e Protezione Civile

Data legend

Zona sismica con probabilità di superamento pari al 10% in 50 anni (ag): 1 = ag > 0,25; 2 = 0,15<ag≤0,25

Headline

Tabella 3: Comuni con il maggior numero di beni culturali in classe sismica 1 (2024)

Data source

Elaborazione ISPRA su dati ISPRA, ISCR e Protezione Civile

Thumbnail
Headline

Figura 1: Beni culturali per le diverse classi sismiche su base comunale (2024)

Data source

Elaborazione ISPRA su dati ISPRA, ISCR e Protezione Civile